FOR OUR PENETRATION-TESTING CLIENTS

 Agentic pentesting.
Included in your pentest round. Yours to keep after.

PenAgent™'s agent swarm has already tested your product alongside our experts during your one-week engagement. Keep it running for a month after, included with your round - then continue on one simple plan, or take the risk and walk away.

See the offer
WHAT IT SOLVES

The problems solved by agentic pentesting.

THE BIG ONE

In an AI-driven world, every release is a risk

Teams ship faster than ever. Much of the code now AI-written, so every deployment can open a fresh vulnerability. Skipping a security check on each release is a bet the downside is simply too high to take.

THE SCHEDULING

Testing on someone else's schedule

Booking an engagement takes weeks. When you just shipped a risky change, "next quarter" is the wrong answer You need to test it now.

THE EXPERTS

Experts are expensive and booked out

Top pentesters command premium rates and long lead times, so a quick check on today's release can mean waiting months for a slot. PenAgent™ tests your product every week, so you're never left waiting for an expert slot.

WHY SPEED MATTERS

The gap from disclosure to exploitation has collapsed
- years to hours.


Average time from a vulnerability becoming known to it being exploited in the wild. What once gave defenders years now gives them hours - so a release that ships untested can be reached the same day.

≈ 2.3 yrs
828
days
2018
684
2019
468
2020
324
2021
291
2022
147
2023
56
2024
23.2
2025
≈ 10 hrs
0.42
days
2026
Ship untested and you're betting attackers won't reach the gap before your next scheduled round. They now can — within hours.
Source: DNV Cyber, as published by Yle; the 2026 figure is a projection.
THE PARADIGM SHIFT NEEDED

Pentesting only the release is legacy. In security, reactive is too late. Proactive is insurance.

Booking a pentest for the release candidate is reactive by design. You find out what is wrong only once the build is frozen. That held when a disclosed flaw took two years to reach the wild: one snapshot bought a long margin of safety. At ten hours there is no margin, and the gate still protects exactly one build. Proactive is the opposite: every week's code tested the week it lands, so the release candidate is already clean and testing keeps running after it ships.

TODAY'S DEFAULT

Test the release candidate

One intensive round, then months of shipping into the dark until the next one is booked.

tested here risk compounds every week →
1of 52 weeks tested: 51 weeks of untested change, and rising risk
WITH THE SWARM

The candidate is already clean

Every week's code is tested the week it lands, so the round confirms rather than discovers.

tested every week risk never accumulates
52of 52 weeks tested: no blind weeks
Illustrative. Risk accumulates in every untested week, before the round as much as after it. One round clears it for that week, then it climbs straight back.
WHY THIS MATTERS

A release candidate is the worst place to discover an auth bypass.

By then the choice is delay the launch or ship a known risk. Testing every week moves that discovery back to where it is cheap to fix — which makes the swarm less an inspection you book, and more cover you leave switched on.

HOW IT WORKS

An agentic swarm, every week.

HOW IT WORKS TODAY

Run by our pentesters, on a weekly basis

01 / YOU PREPARE

You keep the target ready

Keep the test environment and test data in shape for every weekly run.

→
02 / WE LAUNCH

Our pentesters start the run

A Prove pentester scopes the target, supplies credentials and launches the swarm — no setup work on your side.

→
03 / SWARM RUNS

The swarm does the testing

The pentest swarm works the target in parallel and proves what it finds — typically in minutes to hours.

→
04 / WE DELIVER

Our pentesters check & deliver

A Prove pentester reviews every finding, drops anything noisy, and delivers the report to your team.

THE AGENTIC SWARM

Specialist agents - live today, and more on the way.

Each agent is an expert in one attack domain. Forty-two production agents are shipping now. Deepest on authentication, identity and authorization, where the highest-impact flaws live, and spanning the full injection family, business logic, file upload, AI features and the modern web surface.

LIVE NOW

Shipping today

42 production agents

Can an attacker log in as one of your users?

Every realistic route into an account that isn't theirs.

Can they abuse your sign-up and password-reset flows?

The doors either side of your login screen.

Can they pound your login without being stopped?

Whether automated attacks hit a wall, or run all night.

Can one user reach another's data, or do admin things?

The rules deciding who may see and do what, OWASP's number one.

Can another site act through your logged-in users?

Your user's own browser, borrowed by someone else's page.

Can they run malicious code in your users' browsers?

Whether a visitor's own session can be turned against them.

Can they use your server to reach systems it shouldn't?

Your own backend, turned into an attacker's proxy, or its file system.

Can they reach your database through a form field?

The oldest break-in that still works. We prove it without reading or changing your business data.

Can they make your server run something it shouldn't?

Input the server treats as instructions rather than as text.

Can they abuse your file uploads?

Accepting the file is a bug. Serving it back as code is an incident.

Can your modern API surfaces be abused?

GraphQL and WebSockets answer to different rules than your REST endpoints.

Can they cheat your business rules?

Not a broken control, a workflow used in an order nobody designed for.

Can your AI features be turned against you?

If your assistant can call something, a chat message can try to reach it.

Is your infrastructure exposed or out of date?

The plumbing your app runs on.

Can you trust the results, and act on them?

A short list you can act on, not a wall of maybes.

Forty-two specialists, covering the classes the OWASP Top 10:2025 ranks highest, deepest on the authentication, identity and authorization layers. Findings are de-duplicated automatically, so you get one entry per issue.
WHY AN AGENTIC SWARM

Beyond the shallowness of scanners and the limits of manual pentesting.

PenAgentti's agentic pentesting swarm sits where nothing else does - reasoning like a human tester, but ready to run in minutes and at machine scale.

◇ PenAgent™ Traditional scanner (DAST) Manual pentest
Availability Every week — no booking queue On demand Booked months ahead
Verifies & exploits findings Yes — verified, not guessed No — signature guesses Yes
Authentication & identity logic Yes — dedicated agents Largely blind Yes
False-positive noise Low — auto-deduplicated High Low
Time to first result Minutes to hours Hours Days to weeks
Cost to run repeatedly Flat monthly Moderate Hourly/daily prices
Most agents report within minutes. Some session checks run for up to 24 hours by design.
THE FAIR QUESTIONS WE GET ASKED

"Why not just use an LLM?"
"We already review our code with AI."

Both are reasonable - and neither one is a pentest. A single LLM has no specialists, no memory and no proof. AI code review reads your source but never attacks what you actually shipped. Only one of the three tells you what an attacker can reach in your running system.

○

A general-purpose LLM

"Why not just prompt Claude or GPT to hack it?"

  • × One generalist doing everything — shallow on every attack domain.
  • × Loses earlier findings and context as its window fills up.
  • × Works one step at a time — painfully slow across a big surface.
  • × Can describe an attack in detail, but has no tooling to actually run it.
  • × Reports plausible-sounding bugs it never actually verified.
  • × No structure or audit trail of what was really tested.
◐

AI code review

"We already review every PR with AI."

  • ◐ Reads source code — never attacks the system you actually shipped.
  • ◐ Can't see live configuration: TLS, exposed admin pages, outdated servers.
  • ◐ Blind to flows that leave your codebase — like SSO via an external provider.
  • ◐ Flags possible bugs, with no proof they're reachable or exploitable.
  • ◐ Reviewed code isn't what's live — environment and config drift go unseen.
  • ◐ Can't confirm a fix really closed the hole once it's deployed.
Both still earn their place. AI code review catches bugs in the editor, where they are cheapest to fix — it just can't tell you what an attacker reaches in what you deployed. Model-agnostic — currently runs on Claude and Gemini. The difference isn't the model, it's the specialists, shared memory, real attacker tooling and proof-by-exploitation built around it.
FOR OUR PENTEST CLIENTS

Included in your pentest round. Yours to keep after.

We're not going public with Penagentti yet. First it goes to the clients we already run penetration tests for — where the swarm has been working alongside our testers all along. After your round, keep it running.

01 / YOUR ROUND

One intensive week

Our testers run a full penetration test against your product — with Penagentti's swarm already working alongside them, at no extra cost.

→
02 / INCLUDED

1 month included

When the round ends, the swarm keeps testing your product for a month — already included in your engagement, not a new purchase. Continuous coverage after we leave the room.

→
03 / CONTINUE

Keep it running

After that month, continue with the full Penagentti swarm on standby — one simple plan, everything included.

1 MONTH INCLUDED
PENAGENT™ · CONTINUOUS
€2,900
/ month

The same swarm from your pentest round, on a weekly test cycle — one plan, no tiers.

  • Full 42-agent agentic pentesting swarm
  • Weekly runs (1 domain per run)
  • Onboarding kickoff — already covered by your pentest round, or step one if the swarm starts first
  • Priority support — false-positive triage & problem-solving within 24h
The first month is included with a Prove penetration-testing engagement. Each run tests one domain (a single target product). Indicative pricing — subject to change.
NO WAITING

Our experts are booked months out.Your testing doesn't have to be.

Good pentesters are booked two to three months ahead — that is the honest reality of expert demand, and it is also two to three months of shipping with nothing watching. So we split the two apart: take the first pentesting round the calendar allows, and we switch the swarm on now. Book a round and the first month of the swarm is included — and you can keep it running past your pentesting round, not just up to it.

→
This week

The swarm goes live on your target — no waiting for a slot.

Every week after

Findings land while the calendar catches up.

Month 2–3

Your pentesting round runs, on the slot you booked.

And onward

Your included month runs from day one — continue on the monthly plan to keep the swarm running through your round and beyond.

Illustrative. Lead times vary with demand — we will tell you the real first available week when you ask.
WHY THIS IS BETTER THAN WAITING

Your booking date stops being your start date.

By the time your pentesting round arrives, the swarm has already cleared the findable flaws — so our testers spend that week going deeper instead of re-finding the basics. You get results in days rather than months, and a better pentesting round when it lands.

Built by pentesters

Proven methods, encoded into an agentic swarm.

PenAgent™ is built by Prove's senior penetration-testing team — specialists who have delivered over 400 penetration test rounds. Every agent encodes the tradecraft, attack chains and judgment from those real engagements, so the agentic pentesting swarm tests the way our experts do — not the way a checklist does.

400+

Penetration test rounds delivered for clients

42

Production agents live today — and growing

100%

Every reported finding is verified by a Prove pentester.

FAQ

Practical questions, straight answers.

Prove Expertise Oy

Kirkkokatu 8A3, 90100 Oulu

Prove PenAgent™


Penagent is a working product built by Prove's penetration-testing team: the forty-two agents marked live run in real client engagements today, and further specialists are in active development.
The pricing shown is indicative and subject to change rather than a commercial commitment. Some tests place harmless, uniquely marked test values in the application. These are agreed at kickoff, logged, and removed after the run.Security testing should only ever be run against systems you own or are explicitly authorized to test.