FOR OUR PENETRATION-TESTING CLIENTS

 Agentic pentesting.
Included in your pentest round. Yours to keep after.

Penagentti's agent swarm has already tested your product alongside our experts during your one-week engagement. Keep it running for three months after, included with your round — then continue on one simple plan, or take the risk and walk away.

See the offer
WHAT IT SOLVES

The problems solved by agentic pentesting.

🤖
THE BIG ONE

In an AI-driven world, every release is a risk

Teams ship faster than ever — much of the code now AI-written — so every deployment can open a fresh vulnerability. Skipping a security check on each release is a bet the downside is simply too high to take.

🕘
THE TIMING PROBLEM

Testing on someone else's schedule

Booking an engagement takes weeks. When you just shipped a risky change, "next quarter" is the wrong answer — you need to test it now.

THE EXPERT PROBLEM

Experts are expensive and booked out

Top pentesters command premium rates and long lead times, so a quick check on today's release can mean waiting months for a slot. Penagentti is always on standby — ready to test the moment you need it.

WHY SPEED MATTERS

The gap from disclosure to exploitation has collapsed - years to hours.

≈ 2.3 yrs
828
days
2018
684
2019
468
2020
324
2021
291
2022
147
2023
56
2024
23.2
2025
≈ 10 hrs
0.42
days
2026
Ship untested and you're betting attackers won't reach the gap before your next scheduled round. They now can — within hours.
Source: DNV Cyber, as published by Yle; the 2026 figure is a projection.
THE PARADIGM SHIFT NEEDED

In security, reactive is too late. Proactive is insurance.

Booking a pentest for the release candidate is reactive by design. You find out what is wrong only once the build is frozen. That held when a disclosed flaw took two years to reach the wild: one snapshot bought a long margin of safety. At ten hours there is no margin, and the gate still protects exactly one build. Proactive is the opposite: every week's code tested the week it lands, so the release candidate is already clean and testing keeps running after it ships.

TODAY'S DEFAULT

Test the release candidate

One intensive round, then months of shipping into the dark until the next one is booked.

tested here risk compounds every week →
1 of 52 weeks tested — 51 weeks of untested change, and rising risk
WITH THE SWARM

The candidate is already clean

Every week's code is tested the week it lands, so the round confirms rather than discovers.

tested every week risk never accumulates
52 of 52 weeks tested — no blind weeks
Illustrative. Risk accumulates in every untested week — before the round as much as after it. One round clears it for that week; then it climbs straight back.
WHY THIS MATTERS

A release candidate is the worst place to discover an auth bypass.

By then the choice is delay the launch or ship a known risk. Testing every week moves that discovery back to where it is cheap to fix — which makes the swarm less an inspection you book, and more cover you leave switched on.

HOW IT WORKS

The problems solved by agentic pentesting.

HOW IT WORKS TODAY

Run by our pentesters, on your schedule

01 / YOU DECIDE

You call the timing

Tell us when to test — after a risky release, ahead of a launch, or on a standing weekly slot.

02 / WE LAUNCH

Our pentesters start the run

A Prove pentester scopes the target, supplies credentials and launches the swarm — no setup work on your side.

03 / SWARM RUNS

The swarm does the testing

Twenty specialists work the target in parallel and prove what they find — in minutes to hours.

↓ BROKEN DOWN BELOW
04 / WE DELIVER

Our pentesters check & deliver

A Prove pentester reviews every finding, drops anything noisy, and delivers the report to your team.

↳ INSIDE STEP 03

What the swarm does in a run

four phases, minutes to hours
03.1 / RECON

Map the surface

Crawls the app logged in, parses JavaScript bundles for unlinked endpoints, and mines hidden parameters — the authenticated surface, not just public pages.

03.2 / PROBE

Attack in parallel

Specialist agents hit each target at once — tokens, sessions, account flows, XSS — reasoning about what to try next.

03.3 / VERIFY

Prove the exploit

Findings are confirmed by active exploitation, not guessed from a signature. If it can't be reproduced, it isn't reported.

03.4 / REPORT

Deduplicated results

A dedup agent collapses the noise into a clean, prioritized report with reproduction steps — then re-tests your fixes to confirm they hold.

◷ ROADMAP · IN DESIGN

Your team will live in the dashboard

The shared dashboard is still being designed — today findings reach you through your engagement. Once it ships, no CLIs or raw logs to wrangle: every run will land in one place, with deduplicated findings, severity, reproduction steps and fix-retest status, so your team can triage and act the moment a run finishes.

app.penagentti.io / acme-api
Penagentti
Dashboard
⟳  Runs
⚑  Findings
◎  Targets
✦  Agents

acme-api

https://api.acme.io
Run complete
· 142 endpoints · 20 agents · 6m 12s
2 CRITICAL
1 HIGH
3 MEDIUM
142 ENDPOINTS
CRIT JWT alg=none accepted ... /auth/token ✓ verified
CRIT Session fixation → account takeover /login ✓ verified
HIGH BOLA — cross-user order access /orders/{id} ✓ verified
MED Verbose error leaks stack data /api/v1/import ✓ verified
THE AGENTIC SWARM

Specialist agents live today, and more on the way.

Each agent is an expert in one attack domain. Twenty production agents are shipping now — deepest on authentication and identity, where the highest-impact flaws live — with new specialists added continuously as coverage grows across the web & API attack surface.

Overview — plain-language questions each part of the swarm answers about your product, and what you get out of it. Flip to Tech view for the full agent-by-agent breakdown.
LIVE NOW

Shipping today

20 production agents
🔐

Can an attacker log in as one of your users?

Every realistic route into an account that isn't theirs.

  • Weak, default or reused passwords
  • Getting past the login screen without valid credentials
  • Forging or stealing the token that keeps users signed in
  • Bypassing two-factor and single sign-on
Covers: login logic · passwords · tokens (JWT) · cookies & sessions · MFA/OTP · SSO/OIDC
📝

Can they abuse your sign-up and password-reset flows?

The doors either side of your login screen.

  • Creating accounts they shouldn't — or harvesting who's registered
  • Hijacking a password-reset email or link
  • Locking real users out, or bypassing lockout
Covers: registration flow · forgot password · account lockout
🧠

Can they pound your login without being stopped?

Whether automated attacks hit a wall, or run all night.

  • Thousands of rapid-fire login attempts
  • Rate limits, CAPTCHAs and delays — if they exist at all
  • Flooding your users with mail from your own system
Covers: anti-automation · account lockout · email flooding
🩸

Can they run malicious code in your users' browsers?

Whether a visitor's own session can be turned against them.

  • Hostile scripts in pages your users load — each proven in a real browser
  • Tricking the browser into leaking your data to another site
Covers: cross-site scripting (XSS) · cross-origin sharing (CORS)
🖥️

Is your infrastructure exposed or out of date?

The plumbing your app runs on.

  • Weak or outdated HTTPS configuration
  • Exposed admin pages, files and revealing errors
  • Known, already-published flaws in software you run
Covers: TLS/SSL · web-server exposure · known-CVE scanning

Can you trust the results — and act on them?

A short list you can act on, not a wall of maybes.

  • A lead agent plans the run and maps your real attack surface
  • Every issue proven by exploiting it — no false alarms
  • Duplicates merged into one prioritized report
  • Fixes re-tested to confirm the hole is closed
Covers: orchestration · attack-surface discovery · fix verification · deduplication
◷ ROADMAP

Coming next

in build
In progress
🚪

Can one customer see another's data?

Whether one logged-in user can reach another's records — or another customer's.

Covers: access control (BOLA/IDOR) · multi-tenant isolation · mass assignment
In progress
👑

Can a normal user do admin things?

Whether ordinary accounts can reach admin-only features, and whether risky actions re-check who you are.

Covers: privilege escalation (BFLA) · re-auth & step-up
Planned
🚀

Can they break into the systems behind it?

The classic break-ins: your database, your server's shell, your internal network.

Covers: SQL injection · OS command injection · SSRF · path traversal
In progress
🔑

Can API keys or recovery routes be abused?

Whether API keys are over-permissive or never expire — and whether support can be talked into a reset.

Covers: API key & token management · account recovery · SSO federation
Also in build: a live co-pilot mode, letting our testers steer the swarm mid-engagement instead of running it as a batch job. The roadmap is prioritized with early users.
LIVE NOW

Shipping today

20 production agents

Orchestration & discovery

platform layer
🧭 lead

Lead Orchestrator

Plans the engagement, delegates to specialists, and manages shared memory.

🕷️ discovery

Attack-Surface Discovery

Logged-in crawl, JS-bundle endpoint parsing and hidden-parameter mining, unioned.

Identity & access

13 agents
🔑 jwt

JWT & Tokens

Algorithm confusion, weak keys, none-alg forgery, claim tampering, JKU/JWKS injection.

🎫 creds

Credential Security

Default credentials, user enumeration, password policy, login response analysis.

🔒 login

Login Logic

Auth bypass, login CSRF, race conditions, multi-step state, remember-me.

opt-in
📲 mfa

MFA / OTP

Enforcement bypass, OTP brute-force, reuse and expiry, insecure factor enrollment.

🍪 cookie

Cookie Security

Flags, sensitivity classification, cross-domain leakage, predictability.

🔄 session

Session Management

Logout, fixation, password-change and reset invalidation, refresh-token reuse.

opt-in
⏱️ timeout

Session Timeout

Idle and absolute timeout enforcement, measured over runs of up to 24 hours.

📝 register

Registration Flow

Enumeration, mass assignment, verification-token and email-injection abuse.

📧 forgot

Forgot Password

Host-header injection, email-parameter manipulation, token entropy and replay.

opt-in
🔐 lockout

Account Lockout

Threshold, bypass and victim-DoS testing against your lockout policy.

💌 floodgate

Email Flooding

Missing rate limits on sensitive, email-triggering endpoints.

🪪 oidc

SSO / OIDC

Keycloak realm flows, redirect_uri, state/nonce/PKCE, response-mode.

opt-in
🧠 bruteforce

Anti-Automation

Whether rate limiting, CAPTCHA or progressive delay exist at all — and their bypasses.

Client-side & cross-origin

2 agents
🔥 xss

Cross-Site Scripting

Reflected, DOM, stored and blind — every hit confirmed by executing it in a real browser.

🌐 cors

CORS Misconfiguration

The origin-validation bypass matrix, proven by credentialed reflection.

Infrastructure & configuration

3 agents
🔐 tls

TLS / SSL

Configuration and Mozilla-compliance analysis via SSLyze.

🖥️ expose

Web-Server Exposure

Nikto-driven exposure checks, plus information disclosure through error output.

🛰️ CVE

Known-CVE Scanning

Template-based scanning for known vulnerabilities via Nuclei.

Quality control

2 agents
opt-in
verify

Fix Verification

Re-tests previously reported issues to confirm the fix actually closed the hole.

opt-in
🧹 dedup

Deduplication

Collapses duplicate findings across agents into one clean report.

Six agents are opt-in — MFA, session timeout, account lockout, anti-automation, fix verification and deduplication — because they are destructive or long-running. The other fourteen run by default.
◷ ROADMAP

Coming next

in build
In progress 🚪 bola

Access Control

Broken Object Level Auth (BOLA/IDOR) via dual-user context.

In progress 👑 bfla

Privilege Escalation

Broken Function Level Auth — reaching admin functions it shouldn't.

In progress 🔄 stepup

Re-Auth & Step-Up

Whether sensitive actions properly re-challenge the user.

In progress 🔑 apikey

API Key & Token Mgmt

Key issuance, scoping, rotation and revocation flaws.

In progress ♻ recovery

Account Recovery

Recovery paths beyond password reset, including support-channel abuse.

In progress 🤝 federation

SSO Federation

Cross-IdP federation flows, OIDC only — SAML is not in scope.

Planned 📦 bopla

BOPLA / Mass Assignment

Object property-level authorization and over-permissive binding.

Planned 🏢 tenant

Multi-Tenant Isolation

Cross-tenant data access and boundary enforcement.

Planned 💉 sqli

SQL Injection

Identifies and confirms injection points across parameters.

Planned ⌨ cmd

OS Command Injection

Unsafe shell execution and remote command paths.

Planned 🛰 ssrf

Server-Side Request Forgery

Internal-network and cloud-metadata access via SSRF.

Planned 📂 traversal

Path Traversal

Directory traversal and unauthorized file access.

Planned 🧭 copilot

Interactive Co-Pilot

Drive the swarm live during an engagement instead of running a batch.

Roadmap reflects the current build plan and is prioritized with early users — the agentic swarm is designed so new pentesting specialties plug straight into the shared memory.
WHY AN AGENTIC SWARM

Beyond the shallowness of scanners and the limits of manual pentesting.

Penagentti's agentic pentesting swarm sits where nothing else does — reasoning like a human tester, but ready to run in minutes and at machine scale.

◇ Penagentti Traditional scanner (DAST) Manual pentest
Availability On demand — run in minutes On demand Booked months ahead
Verifies & exploits findings Yes — proven, not guessed No — signature guesses Yes
Authentication & identity logic Yes — 13 dedicated agents Largely blind Yes
False-positive noise Low — auto-deduplicated High Low
Time to first result Minutes to hours Hours Days to weeks
Cost to run repeatedly Flat monthly Moderate Hourly/daily prices
Most agents report within minutes. A few deep checks — session idle and absolute timeout — run for up to 24 hours by design.
THE FAIR QUESTIONS WE GET ASKED

"Why not just use an LLM?""We already review our code with AI."

Both are reasonable — and neither one is a pentest. A single LLM has no specialists, no memory and no proof. AI code review reads your source but never attacks what you actually shipped. Only one of the three tells you what an attacker can reach in your running system.

A general-purpose LLM

"Why not just prompt Claude or GPT to hack it?"

  • × One generalist doing everything — shallow on every attack domain.
  • × Loses earlier findings and context as its window fills up.
  • × Works one step at a time — painfully slow across a big surface.
  • × Can describe an attack in detail, but has no tooling to actually run it.
  • × Reports plausible-sounding bugs it never actually verified.
  • × No structure or audit trail of what was really tested.

AI code review

"We already review every PR with AI."

  • Reads source code — never attacks the system you actually shipped.
  • Can't see live configuration: TLS, exposed admin pages, outdated servers.
  • Blind to flows that leave your codebase — like SSO via an external provider.
  • Flags possible bugs, with no proof they're reachable or exploitable.
  • Reviewed code isn't what's live — environment and config drift go unseen.
  • Can't confirm a fix really closed the hole once it's deployed.
Both still earn their place. AI code review catches bugs in the editor, where they are cheapest to fix — it just can't tell you what an attacker reaches in what you deployed. And Penagentti runs on those same frontier models (Claude, GPT, Gemini): the difference isn't the model, it's the specialists, shared memory, real attacker tooling and proof-by-exploitation built around it.
FOR OUR PENTEST QLIENTS

Included in your pentest round. Yours to keep after.

We're not going public with Penagentti yet. First it goes to the clients we already run penetration tests for — where the swarm has been working alongside our testers all along. After your round, keep it running.

01 / YOUR ROUND

One intensive week

Our testers run a full penetration test against your product — with Penagentti's swarm already working alongside them, at no extra cost.

02 / INCLUDED

3 months included

When the round ends, the swarm keeps testing your product for three months — already included in your engagement, not a new purchase. Continuous coverage after we leave the room.

03 / CONTINUE

Keep it running

After those three months, continue with the full Penagentti swarm on standby — one simple plan, everything included.

3 MONTHS INCLUDED
PENAGENTTI · CONTINUOUS
€2,900
/ month

The same swarm from your pentest round, on a weekly test cycle — one plan, no tiers.

  • Full 20-agent agentic pentesting swarm
  • Weekly runs (1 domain per run)
  • Onboarding kickoff — already covered by your pentest round, or step one if the swarm starts first
  • Priority support — false-positive triage & problem-solving within 24h
The three months are included with a Prove penetration-testing engagement. Each run tests one domain (a single target product). Indicative pricing — subject to change.

Prove Expertise Oy

Kirkkokatu 8A3, 90100

Testaus on mielenterveystyötä - kaikki kehittäjästä käyttäjään ovat iloisempia kun softa toimii


Tästä kohtaa yleensä löydät imartelevan mutta virallisen yritysesittelyn. Mutta me molemmat tiedämme ettei kukaan oikeasti jaksa lukea moista soopaa, joten mennään suoraan asiaan! Prove sai alkunsa vuonna 2006, kun halusimme luoda turvasataman ohjelmistotestauksen ja laadun asiantuntijuudelle.
  • Meillä on 35 testausgurua ripoteltuna Ouluun, Helsinkiin ja Tampereelle.
  • Yli 200+ asiakaspalautteemme keskiarvo on 4,86/5
  • Teemme työt aina 110 % tyytyväisyystakuulla! Koska yhteistyö kannattaa vain, jos siitä hyötyvät molemmat osapuolet.
  • Ja jos mistä tahansa syystä tuntuu siltä ettei yhteistyö toimi, voit heivata meidät pois tunnin varoitusajalla!
Huh. Nyt kun tämä on hoidettu alta pois, voit siirtyä katsomaan mitä hyötyä Provesta on oikeasti sinulle!